Muthuvel v. the State Rep by

Crl.O.P.No.18541 of 2020,

Crl.O.P.No.18541 of 2020

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The matter is listed today under the caption “for being mentioned.”

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the case of the petitioner is relating to Crime No.317 of 2020 registered by the Kai Kalathur Police Station and in fact, this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on 07.12.2020, however, a mistake has crept into the order and that the wrong order has been uploaded, thereby, he would seek for clarification.

3.In view of the above submissions so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the order dated 07.12.2020 to be read as follows:

“The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 447, 354, 427, 379 IPC r/w. Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002, in Crime No.317 of 2020 seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to wordy quarrel on account of previous motive in respect of the property, the accused had stated to have trespassed into the property of the defacto complainant and damaged the household articles worth Rs.40,000/- and also assaulted the defacto complainant with wooden log, thereby, causing injuries to the defacto complainant.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case on account of previous motive.