Disposed

Murugan v. State Rep by

Madras HC20 Nov 2020CRL OP/18308/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondent police to issue a notice under Section 41A CrPC to the petitioners. The petitioners were ordered to appear, and the inquiry was mandated to conclude by 18.12.2020 with registration of an FIR or closure. If arrest grounds exist, reasons must be stated in writing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to police to issue notice u/s 41A CrPC; inquiry to conclude by 18.12.2020.

Murugan Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 20.11.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.18308 of 2020

¶6

Murugan ... Petitioners
2. Sivalingam
3. Kanniyammal
Vs.
State Rep. By ... Respondent
The Inspector of Police
Kalambur Police Station
Tiruvannamalai District
(Crime No. Not Known of 2020)

¶7

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.not known of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

¶8

For Petitioners: Mr.S.L.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶9

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶10

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petition enquiry against the petitioners is pending in CSR No.713 of 2020 on the complaint of one Mannarsami.

¶11

The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C to the petitioners. The petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 18.12.2020. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioners, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioners and in that case, the petitioners are at liberty to file necessary application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶14

-sd/20/11/2020

¶15

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶16

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KALAMBUR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.S.L.VENKATESAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.18308/2020
Date :20/11/2020
MN-01/12/2020

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Murugan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sathish Vs State Rep by

Anbu Rani Vs State Rep. by

Easwari @ Esu @ Logeshwari Vs State by

M.Srinivasan Vs the State Rep.by

Arivy @ Aravindan Vs State Rep by

K.Jayaraman Vs the State Rep. by