M. Ashok Vs the State Rep.by Its

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : M/s.Nathan & Associates For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶12

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that FIR has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.4153 of 2020.

¶13

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

In view of the above submissions, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition by quoting the crime number.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

07/12/2020

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SIVAKANCHI POLICE STATION,
KANCHEEPURAM.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. NATHAN AND ASSOCIATES Advocate on payment of
necessary charges
CRL OP.18492/2020
Date :07/12/2020
cs 16/12/2020

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M. Ashok v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Ashok v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Srinivasan Vs the State Rep.by

Murugan Vs State Rep by

Arivy @ Aravindan Vs State Rep by

Ramar (A-1) Vs the State by

Muthuvel Vs the State Rep by

Kalaiselvan Vs State Rep.by