Allowed

Arivy @ Aravindan v. State Rep by

Madras HC20 Nov 2020CRL OP/18300/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving possession of a country-made gun, subject to reporting periodically, posting a bond, and not tampering with evidence or witnesses.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest within 15 days, subject to executing a bond with sureties and complying with specific reporting and conduct conditions.

Arivy @ Aravindan Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 20.11.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.18300 of 2020

Arivu @ Aravindan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Jolarpet Police Station, Thirupathur, Thirupathur District

¶10

(Cr.No.491 of 2020) ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Connection with the Crime No.491 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.I. Periaswamy

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(This case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 286, 337 of I.P.C r/w 25(1)(a) of Arms Act in Crime No.491 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the petitioner along with other persons were in possession of Country made gun. Hence, the complaint.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner along with other accused persons were is possession of country made gun. He would further submit that the main accused/A1 was arrested and the alleged weapon was also recovered from him. However, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the country made gun was recovered and the submissions of the learned Counsel appearing on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;

¶22

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the copy of the order is made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, Thirupathur District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶23

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶24

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶25

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶26

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶27

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶28

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶29

7.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶30

20/11/2020

¶31

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶32

TRUE COPY

¶33

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

¶35

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, THIRUPATHUR

¶36

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR(FOR INFORMATION)

¶37

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶38

4 INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
JOLARPET POLICE STATION,
THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.I.PERIASWAMY Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.18300/2020
Date :20/11/2020
RVR 07/12/2020

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arivy @ Aravindan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arivy @ Aravindan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sathish Vs State Rep by

Anbu Rani Vs State Rep. by

Easwari @ Esu @ Logeshwari Vs State by

M.Srinivasan Vs the State Rep.by

Murugan Vs State Rep by

K.Jayaraman Vs the State Rep. by