Kalil v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court, Madras disposed of a Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The bench found no representation for the petitioners and directed the respondent to take further steps.
What did the court decide?
The respondent shall take further steps in accordance with law.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.12460 of 2020
- Kalil ... Petitioner
2. Pavadai
Vs.
State Rep by, ...Respondent
The Inspector of Police,
Tiruvennainallur Police Station,
Villupuram District.
(Crime No.1282 of 2020)
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., to grant bail to the petitioners in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1282 of 2020 by the respondent police.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER (This case has been heard through video conference)
Today, this case is posted under the caption “For Reporting Compliance.
- When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, the respondent shall take further steps in accordance with law.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.1282 of 2020 in the absence of representation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kalil
- petitioner
Pavadai
- respondent
State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court