Disposed

Perumal v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Aug 2020CRL MP/4770/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail matter, the High Court extended the time granted to the petitioner to deposit bail money, granting four weeks due to the Corona Pandemic, failing which the anticipatory bail order would stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Time of four weeks granted to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.25 of 2019; failure to do so results in automatic dismissal of the bail petition.

Perumal Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 17.08.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.M.P.No.4770 of 2020 in

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.4283 of 2020

¶7

Perumal ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

State Represented By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai.

¶9

... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to extent the time granted in Crl.O.P.No.4283 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020 in Crime No.25 of 2019.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Arun

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

This petition has been filed to extend the time granted to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4283 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020 in Crime No.25 of 2019.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4283 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020 with some conditions. Due to the Corona Pandemic situation, the petitioner could not comply with the conditions within the stipulated period.

¶17

Heard both sides.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and four weeks time is granted to the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Only) to the credit of Crime No.25 of 2019, from the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the petition for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶19

Post the matter after four weeks, under the caption 'for reporting compliance”.

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, ALANDUR. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGALPATTU [FOR INFORMATION].

¶25

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADIPAKKAM, CHENNAI.

¶27

C.C. to M/S.D.ARUN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶28

Order in CRL MP.4770/2020

¶29

in CRL OP.4283/2020

¶30

Date :17/08/2020

¶31

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

MN-28/08/2020

Perumal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Abraham Vs the State

Mohan Vs the State Rep. by

Prabhakaran Vs State Rep by

Kiran @ Kirankumar Vs State Rep.by

Manimaran Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Mohandoss Vs State by