Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of service-related orders and reinstatement was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the court designated dates.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.NO.37545 OF 2004
G.Nagusamy ... Petitioner
v. 1. The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore. 2. The Sub Collector, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to order No.Na.Ka.15749/02/A4, dated 9.4.2003 issued by the sub Collector, Pollachi, the second respondent herein and order No.Na.Ka.23702/2003/E1, dated 28.7.2003 issued by the District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore, the first respondent herein and to quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner in service with all concommittant service and monetary benefits.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, Government Advocate O R D E R
When the matter was listed for hearing on 01.11.2019, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had taken the bundle long back and that the registered letter sent to him was also returned with an endorsement “Refused”. In these circumstances, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 04.11.2019 printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. On 04.11.2019, though the name of the petitioner was printed in the cause list, none appeared for him. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 05.11.2019. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”
today, none appeared for the petitioners. In these circumstances, , this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
1. The District Revenue Officer,
Coimbatore.
2. The Sub Collector,
Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.91975
W.P.No.37545 of 2004
SS(CO)
CS/28/11/2019
G.Nagusamy
The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore
The Sub Collector, Pollachi, Coimbatore District
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
