Dismissed

V.K.Elumalai v. the Registrar of Co-Op

Madras HC5 Nov 2019WP/28700/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition for declaration regarding an FIR. Counsel sought withdrawal on grounds of infutility. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. No substantive legal principles were laid down as the matter was not adjudicated on merits.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

V.K.Elumalai Vs the Registrar of Co-Op — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.NO.28700 OF 2004

¶6

AND

¶7

W.M.P.NO.34855 OF 2004

¶8

U.K.Elumalai ... Petitioner
v.
1. The Registrar of
Co-operative Societies,
NVN Maligai, Kilpauk,
Chennai – 600 010.
2. The Deputy Registrar of
Co-operative Societies,
Tindivanam Region
Villupuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
CCIW CID,
Villupuram Taluk,
Villupuram District. ... Respondents
Prayer:-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of declaration declaring the FIR
No.9 of 2004, dated 03.09.2004 on the file of the 3 rd respondent
is violative of the provisions of sections 73, 81, 161 and 162
of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 (Tamil Nadu
Act, 30 of 1983) and violative of Entry 43 of List-I, Entry 32
of List-II and Entry I of List-III of the VII Schedule of the
Constitution of India and arbitrary, null and void and without
jurisdiction.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/s.T.Dharani

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram Special Govt.Pleader–for R1 & R2

¶11

Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, Government Advocate – for R3

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition for the reason that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶15

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶16

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
1. The Registrar of
Co-operative Societies,
NVN Maligai, Kilpauk,
Chennai – 600 010.
2. The Deputy Registrar of
Co-operative Societies,
Tindivanam Region
Villupuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
CCIW CID, Villupuram Taluk,
Villupuram District.

¶17

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.91974, 91770

¶18

W.P.No.28700 of 2004 and W.M.P.No.34855 of 2004

¶19

SS(CO) CS/28/11/2019

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.K.Elumalai v. the Registrar of Co-Op

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.K.Elumalai v. the Registrar of Co-Op

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Vs Shabeetha Jesudoss

G.Doss Vs the Zonal Manager, Food

K.Chandran Vs State of Tamilnadu

A.v.Kulandaivel Vs the Chairman

Varalakshmi Vs the Secretary to Government

G.Nagusamy Vs the District Revenue Officer