G.Balasundaram v. The Superintending Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking restoration to TANGEDCO. Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking restoration to TANGEDCO. Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :05.03.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.161 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.169 & 170 of 2019
G.Balasundaram ..Petitioner
vs
1.The Superintending Engineer
TANGEDCO
Tiruvanamalai.
2.The Executive Engineer,(O&M)
TANGEDCO
Arani.
3.The Assistant Engineer,(C&I)
TANGEDCO
Arani.
4.The Assistant Engineer(MRT)
TANGEDCO
Tiruvanamalai.
5.L.John Steepan,
Commercial Assistant(MRT)
TANGEDCO
Tiruvanamalai.
.. Respondents
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in Memo No:SET/Adm.2/A.1/F. Promotion-FA to CA/2018 dt: .11.2018 and the Memo No.6027/EE/O&M/Adm/A2/FCA Reposting/2018 dated 29.11.2018 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and thereby direct the respondents to restore the petitioner to TANGEDCO, Arani(O&M) division.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.P.R.Dilipkumar for R1 to R4
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and this Court has granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kak
To
1.The Superintending Engineer
TANGEDCO, Tiruvanamalai.
2.The Executive Engineer,(O&M)
TANGEDCO, Arani.
3.The Assistant Engineer,(C&I)
TANGEDCO, Arani.
4.The Assistant Engineer(MRT)
TANGEDCO, Tiruvanamalai.
5.The Commercial Assistant(MRT)
TANGEDCO
Tiruvanamalai.
+1cc to Mr.N.Suresh, Advocate, S.R.No.20889
W.P.No.161 of 2019
RR(CO)
CS/29/03/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Balasundaram
The Superintending Engineer
The Executive Engineer,(O&M)
The Assistant Engineer,(C&I)
The Assistant Engineer(MRT)
L.John Steepan
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court