Disposed

M.Krishnaveni v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC4 Mar 2019WP/1182/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a direction for departmental action against her husband despite a prior complaint. The Special Government Pleader clarified that disciplinary proceedings were initiated and punishment imposed. Finding the grievance redressed, the Court closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition stands closed. No costs.

M.Krishnaveni Vs The Secretary to Government — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.03.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.1182 of 2019

¶6

M.Krishnaveni ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Secretary to Government,
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City,
Vepperi, Chennai-7.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Chennai Armed Reserve Police-I, Pudupettai,
Chennai. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ or order or orders or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take the departmental action against the petitioner's husband considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2018.

¶8

For Petitioner :Mr.N.Pragalathan

¶9

For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.A.N.Thambi Durai,

¶10

Spl.Govt. Pleader

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The grievances of the writ petitioner is that, inspite of the complaint made by him, no action has been taken by the respondents. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that, the complaint filed by the writ petitioner was considered and disciplinary proceedings were initiated and a punishment was also imposed on the person against whom the complaint is made.

¶13

Thus, the grievances of the writ petitioner has already

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

been redressed and no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No Costs.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pkn
To
1. The Secretary to Government,
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City,
Vepperi, Chennai-7.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Chennai Armed Reserve Police-I, Pudupettai,
Chennai.
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, SR.No.20520
+1 cc to M/s.Kingsly Solomon, Advocate Sr.No.20139
W.P.No.1182 of 2019
SJ(CO)
CSL/27.03.2019

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Krishnaveni v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Krishnaveni v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

B.Hariharan (Reg.No. 010002237) Vs The Chairman

N.T.Vijayalakshmi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Dr.S.Siva, M.D., Vs The Secretary to Government

B.Babu Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Perumal Vs The Director