D. Meshak v. D. Sivalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a second appeal filed by the appellant as withdrawn by counsel on the date of the hearing.
What did the court decide?
Court fee refund directed to be made if permissible under law.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A. No.167 of 2016 and
CMP. No. 3422 of 2016
D. Meshak
...Appellant / Appellant / Defendant
Vs.
D.Sivalingam
...Respondent / Respondent / Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2015 passed in A.S.No.8 of 2014 on the file of subordinate judge, Harur confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.50 of 2008 dated 19.06.2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Harur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D. Meshak
- respondent
D. Sivalingam
Coram
T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court