A.Kamalaveni v. S.Arumugham
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Both appellants and respondents were absent despite two prior calls. No hearing was conducted.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
A.S. No.202 of 2010
- A.Kamalaveni
- A.Amutha
- A. Kannan 4. A. Muralidharan ...Appellants/Plaintiffs
Vs.
- S.Arumugham
- P.Venkatachalam ...Respondents
Prayer: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court No.1, salem dated 16.12.2009 in O.S.No.59 of 2008.
For Appellants : No appearance For respondents : No appearance. JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Kamalaveni
- appellant
A. Amutha
- appellant
A. Kannan
- appellant
A. Muralidharan
- respondent
S. Arumugham
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court