Abdul Gafoor v. Abdul Razak
Case brief
What is this about?
Public second appeal filed by appellant Abdul Gafoor against a judgment dismissing his lower court suit. Appellant did not appear. Judgment dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal and connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.06.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.665 of 2019
Abdul Gafoor
Rep. by its power agent R.Chidambaram
...Appellant /Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.
- Abdul Razak ... 1st Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Ummal Huda (died) 2. Nazer .... 2nd Respondent/LRs of the 2nd Defendant
Cause title accepted vide order of court dated 01.02.2019 made in CMP No.9400 of 2005 in SA SR No.61109/04.
R2 brought on record as legal heir of the deceased Ummal Huda vide order of court dated 01.02.2019 made in CMP No.9401/05 in SA SR. No.61109/04.
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2003 in A.S.No.65 of 2003 on the file of District Court, Nagapattinam dismissing the judgment against the order dated 19.03.2003 in O.S.No.282 of 1998 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam.
For Appellant : No appearance. JUDGMENT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be decided in the absence of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abdul Gafoor
- respondent
Abdul Razak
- respondent
Nazer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court