Selvamani v. Ponnusamy @ Ponnukutty
Case brief
What is this about?
11602 of 2019 in S.A.No.230 of 2016 TRNJ…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.11599, 11600 and 11602 of 2019 in S.A.No.230 of 2016
TRNJ
Both Counsel present and heard.
Counsel for the respondents takes notice on behalf of the proposed respondents 6 to 11 and undertakes to file Vakalat for the Respondents.
Counter not filed in the applications.
Considering the reasons adduced in the affidavit with reference to the delay, they being acceptable as well as in the interest of justice, the petitions are ordered.
Registry is directed to amend the appeal memorandum accordingly. Post the appeal on 26.06.2019.
17.06.2019
bga/rl
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court