M. Boomathi v. S. Muthusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.344 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012
M.Boomathi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Muthusamy
2.Palaniammal
3.Murugasamy ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India against the petition and order passed in E.A.No. Of
2009 in E.P.No.92 of 2007 in O.S.No.129 of 1991 dated
01.10.2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Dharapuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Navaneetha Krishnan
For Respondents: R1 - died
R2 & R3 – no appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision
Petition has become infructuous.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
-s/dAssistant Registrar(CS-I) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar va To The Sub Court, Dharapuram. +1 CC to M/s. Swaraj Associates sr 86730. C.R.P.No.344 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 SPD(CO) SP(11/11/2019)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Boomathi
- respondent
S.Muthusamy
- respondent
Palaniammal
- respondent
Murugasamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court