K.Ponnusamy v. R.Suresh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite prior adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected misc. petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.1983 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
K.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs. R.Suresh Kumar ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order in I.A.No.123 of 2014 in O.S.No.198 of 2013 pending before the District Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur dated 02.04.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Easan – no appearance For Respondent : Not ready in notice
O R D E R
When the matter was listed for hearing on 04.10.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was adjourned to 14.10.2019. On 14.10.2019 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 15.10.2019. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Ponnusamy
- respondent
R.Suresh Kumar
Coram
M. DURAISWAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court