Three Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 were dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear at the final hearing despite earlier adjournments.
Civil Revision Petitions No.3071 to 3073 of 2009 dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2009
S.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner in all the 3 C.R.Ps
Vs.
1.M/s.Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Ltd.,
Tondiarpet Branch,
Chennai – 600 002. ... 1 st Respondent in all the 3 C.R.Ps
2.Junior Agnaiya
3.V.Nirmala
4.M.Srinivasan ... Respondents 2 to 4 in
C.R.P.No.3071 of 2009
2.A.Hendry
3.D.Balaji
4.A.Govindaraj ... Respondents 2 to 4 in
C.R.P.No.3072 of 2009
2.C.Uthannamurthy
3.C.Vasudevan ... Respondents 2 & 3 in
C.R.P.No.3073 of 2009
C.R.P.No.3071 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India against the order passed in E.P.No.1738 of 2006 in A.R.C.No.1240 of 2004 on 25.03.2008 passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
Page 1 / 4
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
C.R.P.No.3072 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.P.No.2985 of 2006 in A.R.C.No.710 of 2004 on 22.02.2007 passed by the IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
C.R.P.No.3073 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in E.P.No.2460 of 2007 in A.R.C.No.1660 of 2004 on 24.03.2008 passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Murugan – no appearance – in all 3 C.R.Ps For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan (R1 - in all 3 C.R.Ps) R3 & R4 – no appearance (C.R.P.No.3071/2009) R2 – not ready in notice (C.R.P.No.3071/2009) R2 & R3 – No appearance (C.R.P.No.3072/2009) R4 – refused (C.R.P.No.3072/2009) R2 & R3 – No appearance (C.R.P.No.3073/2009) C O M M O N O R D E R
When the matter was listed for hearing on 14.10.2019, there was no
representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 15.10.2019. On 15.10.2019 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 16.10.2019. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today also there is no representation for
Page 2 / 4
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petitions for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Index : Yes/No 16.10.2019
va
To
1.The IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2.The X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
Page 3 / 4
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
M. DURAISWAMY,J.
va
C.R.P.Nos.3071 to 3073 of 2009
and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2009
16.10.2019
Page 4 / 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Vijayalakshmi
M/s.Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Ltd.
M. DURAI_SWAPRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
