Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the date fixed for hearing despite being listed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P. PD 2892 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P. (PD) 2892 of 2015 and M.P. 1 of 2015 P.Sureshkumar ... Petitioner Versus P.Kanthabai ... Respondent PRAYER :Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 10.04.2015 and made in I.A.No.34 of 2013 in R.C.O.P. No.4 of 2011 on the file of Principal District Munsif (Rent Control Officer), Chidambaram.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Bhuvaneswaran
O R D E R
When the above Civil Revision Petition was earlier listed before this Court on 04.12.2019 for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, with a view to afford
1/3
C.R.P. PD 2892 of 2015
an opportunity to the petitioner, this matter was ordered to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter further. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition in M.P. 1 of 2015 is closed.
05.12.2019 rpp To
Principal District Judge, Principal District Munsif (Rent Control Officer), Chidambaram.
2/3
C.R.P. PD 2892 of 2015
V.BHARATHIDASAN,J.
rpp
C.R.P.PD 2892 of 2015
and
M.P. 1 of 2015
05.12.2019
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Sureshkumar
P. Kanthabai
V.Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
