Saraswathi Ammal v. Sekar
Case brief
What is this about?
A Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 was dismissed as infructuous because the main suit it challenged had already been disposed of by the lower court, rendering the petitioner's relief sought purposeless.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded; the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(PD).No.2698 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P(PD).No.2698 of 2015
and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
1. Saraswathi Ammal
2. Ramamoorthy ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. Sekar
2. Nagavelu
3. Rathina Kumar
4. Vimala
5. Murali
6. Thenmozhi
7. Palani
1/3
C.R.P(PD).No.2698 of 2015
- Vaniitha
- Ananthi ... Respondents
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution of India against the fair and final order made in I.A.No.178 of 2015 in O.S.No.145 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, dated 31.03.2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saraswathi Ammal, etc.
- respondent
Sekar, Nagavelu, Rathina Kumar, Vimala, Murali, Thenmozhi, Palani, Vaniitha, Ananthi
Coram
V.BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court