Karthika v. Mylsamy@Rangaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under constitutional jurisdiction was dismissed as withdrawn along with a connected Miscellaneous Petition. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P. PD 2651 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P. PD 2651 of 2015
and
M.P. 1 of 2015
1. M.Karthika
2. Minor Arul Prakash
rep. by his mother/guardian
Singaram
3. M.Singaram ... Petitioners
Versus
1. S.Mylsamy @ Rangaraj
2. S.Sulochana
3. S.Pappathi @ Balamani
4. S.Amaravathi ... Respondents
PRAYER :Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of
Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Final order dated 12.06.2014 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet in I.A.No.297 of 2013 in O.S.No.106 of 2011. For Petitioner : Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan
1/3
C.R.P. PD 2651 of 2015
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Karthika and others
- respondent
S.Mylsamy @ Rangaraj and others
Coram
V.BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court