The single-paragraph order closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the respondents for alleged disobedience of an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 21.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Cont.P.No.1110 of 2018
M.Kothandapani ...Petitioner
Vs
1.Mr.K.Muthukaruppan
Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd.,
3/137, Salamedu, Valuthareddy - Post,
Villupuram - 605 602.
2.Thiru.Arumugam
Administrator
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Pension Fund Trust,
Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai,
Chennai -2. ...Respondents
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience
of the order dated 13.07.2016 in W.P.No.24026 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan
For Respondents : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted
that the order and direction issued by this Court has been
complied with though partly.
petition is closed.
2
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
svki
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. PS/23/01/2019 To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd., 3/137, Salamedu, Valuthareddy - Post, Villupuram - 605 602.
2.The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Kothandapani
Mr.K.Muthukaruppan
Thiru.Arumugam
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
