K. Asokan, v. J.M. Kennady
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed alleging non-compliance of a prior order. It was recorded that the direction was complied with by paying a sum directly to the petitioner's bank account.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition is closed as the respondent had complied with the directed order by making the payment.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2019
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.2626 of 2018
K.Asokan
...Petitioner vs. Mr.J.M.Kennady, The Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Trichy. ...Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately violating the order dated 26.10.2017 passed in W.P.No.26861 of 2003 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner .. Mr.V.Kadhirvelu For Respondents .. Mrs.R.Hemalatha Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER Alleging that the order dated 26.10.2017 passed by
this Court in W.P.No.26861 of 2003 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 26.10.2017 passed in W.P.No.26861 of 2003 was complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Asokan
- respondent
The Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Trichy
Coram
T. S. Sivananam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court