This is a short order in a contempt petition. The court held that the contemnor (respondent) fully obeyed the earlier order. The petitioner failed to challenge the rejection of her claim. Thus, no contempt was found. The petition was closed.
contempt petition closed as the contemnor has fully obeyed the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.No.1723 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 15.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
CONT.P.No.1723 of 2019
M.Sumathi .. Petitioner
Versus
V.Vijayalakshmi .. Respondent
Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt
of Courts Act to punish the respondent for disrespecting the
Hon'ble Court order dated 22.11.2018 passed in W.P.No.28938 of
2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh
O R D E R
This contempt petition is directed against the order passed on 22.11.2018 in W.P.No.28938 of 2018, wherein, this Court had directed the fourth respondent therein, who is the Contemnor herein, to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 14.07.2011 and 05.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and respondents 1 and 2 and also affording due opportunity of hearing to the
1
CONT.P.No.1723 of 2019
petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.
vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.5238/2018/A2 had considered the
representations of the petitioner and had given her a personal
hearing and passed an order, however, rejecting the claim of
the petitioner. The Contempt Petitioner, instead of challenging the said order in the manner known to law, has filed this Contempt Petition. However, the order of this Court
has been obeyed and there is no contempt. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it is open to her to challenge the same.
srn
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/08/01/2020
To The Tahsildar, Madukarai Taluk, Coimbatore District.
2
1 issue framed by the court
whether the respondent disrespected the order of this court and committed contempt of court
m.sumathi
v.vijayalakshmi
pushpa sathyanarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
