The Court directed furnishing of security or attachment of property from a respondent. Since no security was furnished, the application for attachment was allowed and the matter was closed.
Order of attachment of property as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application No.5973 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 18.10.2019, directed the respondents to furnish security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.55,79,460.31, on or before 15.11.2019, failing which, an order of attachment would be passed.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
drl
prayed for.
and this application stands closed. The parties are free to take such action, as they may desire hereinafter, in accordance with law.
15.11.2019
drl
Application No.5973 of 2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for attachment of property stands allowed in view of non-furnishing of security directed by this Court.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
RESPONDENTS
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
