The Court held service on respondents sufficient due to returned notices and closed the application, ordering attachment of assets to the extent of the claimed amount since security was not furnished.
ssent
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.256 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 18.10.2019, directed the respondents to furnish
security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.2,93,527.05/- on or before 15.11.2019, failing which, an order of attachment order would be passed.
counsel for the applicant would submit that no security has been furnished as directed by this Court. He would further submit that an award in arbitration between the applicant and the respondents has been passed on 12.02.2019.
2
srn
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J
Hence, service to the respondents is held sufficient. In the above circumstances, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. The order of attachment shall be transmitted through the Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
PUSHPA SATHANARAYANA J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
