This is an interim order regarding an application for attachment. The court held that service on the respondent was sufficient despite the lack of personal representation and ordered the attachment as prayed for.
Attachment order is passed and the application is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.255 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 18.10.2019, directed the respondent to furnish
security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.5,19,483.62/- on or before 15.11.2019, failing which, an order of attachment would be passed.
counsel for the applicant would submit that no security has been furnished as directed by this Court. He would further submit that an
award in arbitration between the applicant and the respondent has been passed on 12.02.2019.
list after service by paper publication, there is no representation for him either in person or through counsel.
2
srn
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J
Hence, service to the respondent is held sufficient. In the above circumstances, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. The order of attachment shall be transmitted through the Subordinate Court, Tirupur and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
