Dismissed

G.Stephen, v. the Managing Director

Madras HC9 May 2018WP(MD)/10669/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a transport corporation employee, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a transfer and relieving order and to be retained in his original branch. The court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the matter at the departmental level leading to dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue matter at departmental level.

G.Stephen, Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.05.2018 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶4

W.P(MD)No.10669 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9759 and 9760 of 2018

¶5

G.Stephen : Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶8

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichy – 620 001.

¶9

3.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Manapparai Branch, Manapparai, Trichy District.

¶10

4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Cantonment Mofussil Branch, Trichy. : Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned transfer order passed by the 2^nd respondent in jmNghf/jpUr;rp/ggp.gpG/1899/18 dated 28/04/2018 and the consequential relieving order in jmNghf/fpis/kz.vz;:/1918 dated 05/05/2018 passed by the 3^rd respondent, quash the same and consequently directing the 2^nd respondent to retain the petitioner in the 3^rd respondent Branch.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : Ms.P.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman

¶13

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter at the Departmental level. Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶16

Sd/Vacation Officer(RTI)

¶17

/True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichy – 620 001. 3.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Manapparai Branch, Manapparai, Trichy District. 4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Cantonment Mofussil Branch, Trichy. COPY TO: The Record Clerk, E.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (Two Copies) +1cc to M/S.P.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi, Advocate SR.No. 65235

¶21

W.P(MD)No.10669 of 2018 09.05.2018

¶22

mm/smn2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JM/SV MMS/SAR 1/10.05.2018/2P/8C

G.Stephen, v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Stephen, v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja, Vs the Inspector of Police

Jeyaprakash, S/O.Mokkaraj, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Ranjithkumar Vs the Insepctor of Police

Kalaiganam, Vs the Inspector of Police

Praveenkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Petchi, Vs the Inspector of Police