Allowed

M.Ranjithkumar v. the Insepctor of Police

Madras HC28 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/7316/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to M.Ranjithkumar apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 406, 420, and 294(b) IPC. The order imposed conditions including execution of bail bond and appearance before police or magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Order directed release on bail in event of arrest upon executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and complying with specific conditions including appearance before Magistrate and police.

M.Ranjithkumar Vs the Insepctor of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Saturday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.7316 of 2018

¶6

M.RANJITHKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1

¶7

STATE REP.BY THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE CHEKKANOORANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.120/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S.R.RAMASAMY Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 294(b) of I.P.C., in Crime No.120 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and that he has not committed any such offence alleged by the respondent and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶14

One Annakodi who is the defacto complainant had lodged a complaint against the petitioner and his relatives and his family members for cheating a sum of Rs.3,75,000/- by holding a false assurance that they would secure a public employment for her son. The learned counsel for the petitioner filed typed set of papers which indicates that there was a money transaction between the petitioner's brother Jeyakumar and the defacto complainant and the matter was enquired into and closed in the month of March 2018.

¶15

This Court prima facie on merits went through the contents of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be

¶17

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatty, and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶18

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶21

¶22

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTY.

¶23

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶24

THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE

¶25

CHEKKANOORANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶26

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶27

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.R.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.7979

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.7316 of 2018

¶30

MS/CM/GSR/08.05.2018/2P.6C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Ranjithkumar v. the Insepctor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ranjithkumar v. the Insepctor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Kutti Raja Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Ramaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Veluchamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Sivasankaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

David Raja Bose Vs S. Abraham Thambi Raja

Soundaravelan Vs the Inspector of Police