Court dismissed this writ petition as there was no necessity for further adjudication since the 1st respondent had already taken appropriate action pursuant to the 2nd respondent's direction of 10.09.2007.
Writ petition dismissed with no costs as the issue was already resolved by the 1st respondent's action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
WP.No.6944 of 2008
M.Natarajan ...Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the the 1st respondent herein to enforce the direction given by the Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Cehnnai - 600 008, the 2nd respondent herein in his proceedings bearing No.G 15325 of 2007 dated 10.09.2007, in directing the 1st respondent to inspect and take appropriate action against such construction put up at No.17, 1st Floor, Kannagi Nagar, Korattur, Padi, Ambathur Taluk, Chennai - 600 080.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.Karthikaa Ashok (for R1) Mr.N.Sampath (for R2) Mr.M.L.Ramesh (for R3)
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to enforce the direction given by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings bearing No.G 15325 of 2007 dated 10.09.2007 .
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1.The Commissioner,
The Chennai City Municipal Corporation,
Rep. by its Commissioner, Chennai.
2.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
+1 CC to Mr.M.L. Ramesh, advocate sr 9628. +1 CC to Mr.N. Sampath, Advocate sr 9250.
WP.No.6944 of 2008
SP(21/02/2018)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further adjudication is necessary when the respondent has already taken appropriate action as per the impleaded order.
M. Natarajan
The Commissioner, The Chennai City Municipal Corporation
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Padi Vattara Nadar Sangam
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
