Dismissed

J.Thilagar v. the District Collector

Madras HC6 Feb 2018WP/5536/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking allotment of a shop in Sriperumbudur bus stand commercial complex, finding no vacancy and granting liberty to participate in a public auction for four vacant shops on Gandhi Road.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to participate in the public auction for vacant shops on Gandhi Road.

J.Thilagar Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.02.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.No.5536 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶6

J.Thilagar

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1. The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Kanchipuram.

¶10

1. The Secretary, Town Panchayat, Collectorate, Kanchipuram.

¶11

1. The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot a shop within the commercial complex situated in the Bus Stand premises at Sriperumbudur.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. C.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.N. Manikandan, GA ORDER

¶14

The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondent to allot a shop within the commercial complex situated in the Bus Stand premises at Sriperumbudur.

¶15

2 Heard Mr. C.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.N. Manikandan, learned Government Advocate for the respondents and perused the records.

¶16

3 The learned Government Advocate submitted that all the shops within the commercial complex in Sriperumbudur bus stand were already let out by the third respondent and there is no vacancy. It is further submitted that four shops are vacant in Gandhi Road for commercial purpose and if the petitioner is really interested in getting any one of the four shops, he is at liberty to participate in the public auction.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

4 In the light of the above facts, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to participate in the action to be conducted by the respondent. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpl
To
1. The District Collector,
Office of the Collectorate
Kanchipuram.
2. The Secretary,
Town Panchayat,Collectorate, Kanchipuram.
3. The Executive Officer,
Town Panchayat, Sriperumbudur,
Kanchipuram District.
+1cc to Mr.C.RAMESH, Advocate, S.R.No. 8793
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 9726
W.P.No.5536 of 2014
TR(21/02/2018)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Thilagar v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Thilagar v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jkm Boxing Club Vs The Commissioner

M/s.Ashok Nandavanam Vs The Special Officer

S.M.Elumalai, Vs The District Collector

G.Prem Anand Vs the Managing Director

C.Manikandan Vs the Executive Engineer

I.Raju Vs the Asst. Superintendent