Dismissed

N.R.Satheesh Moorthy, v. the Commissioner

Madras HC7 Feb 2018WP/18168/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner via Writ Petition sought mandamus to stop respondents from erecting a bus stop on his petrol bunk exit. Respondents stated they placed the shelter elsewhere and have no proposal to erect it there. Court recorded this statement and closed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed without costs; connected miscellaneous petition also closed.

N.R.Satheesh Moorthy, Vs the Commissioner — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.02.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

WP.No.18168 of 2010

¶6

& M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶7

N.R.Satheesh Moorthy ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Ambattur Municipality,
Ambattur, Chennai - 53.
2.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Ripon Building,
Chennai.
3.The Assistant commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai.
Division No.80, Zone 7,
Ambattur, Chennai -53. ...Respondents
[R2 and R3 are impleaded as per the order of this Court,
dated 07.02.2018 in M.P.No.1 of 2014
in W.P.No.18168 of 2010.]

¶9

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from erecting bus stop on the exit way of the petitioner's petrol bunk situated at Door No.125, Chengundram Salai (Redhills Road), Ambattur, Chenai - 600 053.

¶10

The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondent from erecting bus stop on the exit way of the petitioner's petrol bunk, situated at Door No.125, Chengundram Salai (Redhills Road), Ambattur, Chenai - 600 053.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the Corporation / respondents 2 and 3.

¶13

It is submitted by the learned standing counsel for the respondents 2 & 3 / Corporation that the respondents 2 & 3 / Corporation have put up the bus shelter in a different place and they have no proposal to erect bus shelter in the exit way of the petitioner's petrol bunk.

¶14

Recording the statement of the learned standing Counsel for the respondents 2 & 3 / Corporation, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶15

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1.The Commissioner,
Ambattur Municipality,
Ambattur, Chennai - 53.
2.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Ripon Building,
Chennai.
3.The Assistant commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai.
Division No.80, Zone 7,
Ambattur, Chennai -53.

¶16

+1 CC to Mr.T.C. Gopalakrishnan, Advocate sr 9285. +1 CC to Mr.C. Prakasam, Advocate sr 10231

¶17

WP.No.18168 of 2010

¶18

NRI(CO) SP(01/03/2018)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.R.Satheesh Moorthy, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.R.Satheesh Moorthy, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharani Hi-Tech Projects Vs The District Collector

J.Thilagar Vs the District Collector

S.M.Elumalai Vs the District Collector

M.Baskaran, Vs The Commissioner of

Nethrodaya Vs The Secretary to Government

B.Jayanthi Vs the Inspector of Panchayat &