D.Kamakshi v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court directed the 2nd respondent to consider a pending representation by the petitioner regarding patta cancellation and issue within six weeks following personal hearing.
What did the court decide?
Direction to 2nd respondent to consider pending representation and pass orders within six weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.08.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.6631 of 2014
D.Kamakshi ...Petitioner
Vs 1.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Sirkazhi 2.Revenue Divisional Office, Mayiladuthurai. 3.District Collector, Nagapattinam District. 4.David Kiruba ...Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing 1st respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.11.2010 for cancellation of patta in the name of the 4th respondent and to issue patta to and in favour of the petitioner with respect to a total extent of 99 cents of land namely 90 cents in Survey No.310/2 and 9 cents in Survey No.314/A, Kovilpathu Village, Nemmeli, Sirkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam District.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sadasharam
For R1 to R3 : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's pending representation and pass orders on merits within six weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Kamakshi
- respondent
Tahsildar Taluk Office, Sirkazhi
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Office, Mayiladuthurai
- respondent
District Collector, Nagapattinam District
- respondent
David Kiruba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court