M.Muhtu v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to fix rent on premises, the petitioner submitted that the challenged order was no longer contested as rent had already been paid, leading to the closure of the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.08.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.5560 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
M.Muthu
...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Chennai.
2.The Executive Officer,
Arulmighu Chelliamman Mariamman Temple,
Kumarasamy Pettai,
Dharmapuri Taluk and District. ...Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to re-fix the rent for the premises under the occupation of the petitioner after hearing the objections of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam
For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
Special Government Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Muthu
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Chelliamman Mariamman Temple
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court