Disposed

L.Rajendran, v. The District Collector

Madras HC14 Aug 2018WP/20598/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a consensual disposal at the admission stage, this Madras High Court directed five respondent revenue officials to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2018 concerning land survey and measurement, passing appropriate orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the representation dated 09.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

L.Rajendran, Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.08.2018 CORAM :

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

W.P.No.20598 of 2018

L.Rajendran

... Petitioner

The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶8

The District Revenue Officer, (DRO), Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur - 602 001.

¶9

The Revenue Divisional Officer, (RDO), Thiruvallur Division, Thiruvallur. 4. The District Surveyor, District Survey Department, Thiruvallur Collectorate Office, Thiruvallur 602 001. 5. The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. 6.E.Seenivasan 7.E.Anandhakrishnan 8.E.Ravi 9.M.Sethuraman 10.A.Mohan 11.A.Dhamodharan 12.A.Athimoolam 13.A.Ekambaram 14.A.Kumaran

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

15.A.Saravanan

¶12

16.A.Balasubramani ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to inspect, measure and survey the entire lands totally measuring 40 cents (Northern 20 cents and Southern 20 cents) comprised in Survey No.10/19, situated at Veeraraghavapuram Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District, demarcate the boundaries and correct the wrong entries in Revenue records forthwith on the basis of petitioner's various representations including the final representation dated 09.07.2018 in accordance with law.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.N.R.Anantha Ramakrishnan For Respondents: Mr.J.Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5 O R D E R

¶15

By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶16

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to inspect, measure and survey the entire lands totally measuring 40 cents (Northern 20 cents and Southern 20 cents) comprised in Survey No.10/19, situated at Veeraraghavapuram Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District, demarcate the boundaries and correct the wrong entries in Revenue records on the basis of petitioner's various representations including the final representation dated 09.07.2018 in accordance with law.

¶17

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation claiming the same relief as prayed in this writ petition, but, the said representation is yet to be disposed of by the respondent Nos.1 to 5. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the representation dated 09.07.2018 made by the petitioner is directed to be considered by the respondent Nos.1 to 5, on merits.

¶18

Mr.J.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5, submitted that the respondents be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2018 and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, this Court directs the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶23

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

gsk To 1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. 2. The District Revenue Officer, (DRO), Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur - 602 001. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (RDO), Thiruvallur Division, Thiruvallur. 4. The District Surveyor, District Survey Department, Thiruvallur Collectorate Office, Thiruvallur 602 001. 5. The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

+1cc to Mr.N.R.Anantha Rama Krishnan, Advocate,S.R.No.55841 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.56403

W.P.No.20598 of 2018

NRL(co)

rrs 6/09/2018

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

L.Rajendran, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Rajendran, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Senthil Kumar,S/o.Gurusamy Vs The District Registrar, office

Mrs.Visranthamma Vs The Tahsildar

Dr.K.R.Chitra, Vs The District Collector

Mrs.U.Shyamala Vs the Tashildar

E.Viswanathan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Murugesh, Vs The District Collector