Disposed

Mrs.Visranthamma v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC13 Aug 2018WP/20729/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.03.2018 to correct the Legal heirship Certificate of the deceased. Court directed the respondent to consider the representation, pass orders on merits, and hold a personal hearing within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider the representation dated 08.03.2018, pass orders on merits, and hold personal hearing within four weeks.

Mrs.Visranthamma Vs The Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.08.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.20729 of 2018

¶6

...Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, Ayanavaram Taluk, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 23 ... Respondent

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.03.2018 to correct the Legal heirship Certificate of Late. G.Israel vide Ni.Mu.No.A3/09496/2015 dated 30.09.2015 issued by the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram Taluk.

¶8

For Petitioner : Ms.T.Ramadevi For Respondent : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP ORDER

¶9

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to consider her representation dated 08.03.2018 to correct the Legal heir ship Certificate of Late. G.Israel vide Ni.Mu.No.A3/09496/2015 dated 30.09.2015 issued by the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram Taluk.

¶10

2.According to the petitioner, her husband G.Israel died on 30.07.2012 due to illness. However, she had applied for Legal heirship Certificate wherein all the required papers relating to her status were submitted and she was issued with the same on 30.09.2015 by the respondent. According to her, due to some corrections in the said legal heirship certificate, she made a representation to the respondent seeking the above prayer. Finding no response, she is before this Court.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court hereby directs the respondent to consider the representation dated 08.03.2018 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties.

¶13

4.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
The Tahsildar,
Ayanavaram Taluk,
Ayanavaram,
Chennai – 23.
+1cc to Mr.T. Ramadevi, Advocate SR.No.56104
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.55725
W.P.No.20729 of 2018
GM(04/09/2018)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Visranthamma v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Visranthamma v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Tamilnadu Power Producers Vs State of Tamilnadu

Mrs.Hayath Bee Vs State of Tamilnadu

K.Kamaraj Vs the Chairman and Managing

G.Senthil Kumar,S/o.Gurusamy Vs The District Registrar, office

Dr.K.R.Chitra, Vs The District Collector

P.Kumar, Vs The Tahsildar