Janakam Ammal, v. N.Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal abated because the appellant and respondents passed away and counsel could not secure instructions. Appeal dismissed with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.11.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S.A.No.592 of 2005
Janakam Ammal
... Appellant/3 rd Defendant
vs.
1. N.Selvaraj
2. Andal Ammal
3.Damayanthi
... Respondents/Plaintiff, 1st&nd2 Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2004 passed in A.S.No.12/2003 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti reversing the judgement and the decree dated 19.03.2003 passed in O.S.No.442/95 before the District Munsif's Court, Panruti.
For Appellant : R.Subramanian
For Respondents : Mr.R.Gururaj for R1
None appeared for R2 & R3
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant made a submission that both the appellant as well as the respondents in the second appeal passed away and the learned respective counsels are unable to secure instructions to proceed with the matter.
- Thus the second appeal stands dismissed as abated. No Costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Janakam Ammal
- respondent
N.Selvaraj
- respondent
Andal Ammal
- respondent
Damayanthi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court