Rangasamy v. Elumalai
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras permitted the appellants to withdraw the second appeal filed under section 100 CPC. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, associated petitions were closed, and no costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
SA.No.333 of 2006
and
C.M.P.Nos.4563 of 2006 and 418 of 2012
1.Rangasamy
2.Krishnan
3.Velu
4.Ulaganathan
..Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
1.Elumalai
2.Malliga ..Respondents/Plaintiffs
Prayer:Second Appeal filed under section 100 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.05
passed in A.S.No.16 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Court,
Madurantagam reversing the judgment and decree dated 07.01.05
passed in O.S.No.311 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsiff
Court, Madurantagam.
For Appellants : Mr.K.Goviganesan
For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Based on the oral submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants to withdraw the second appeal, this Court has granted permission to withdraw the second appeal.
2.Accordingly, the second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rangasamy
- appellant
Krishnan
- appellant
Velu
- appellant
Ulaganathan
- respondent
Elumalai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court