Allowed

Rajiv Gandhi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6464/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a criminal case arising under sections 147, 294(b), 342, and 506(ii) IPC. Bail was granted on execution of a bond with two sureties and conditions to appear before police for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail on execution of a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each for a like sum and compliance with stipulated conditions.

Rajiv Gandhi Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6464 of 2018

¶7

1 RAJIV GANDHI

¶8

2 RAMESH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.2&3

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT,

¶11

CR NO. 131/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioners : MR.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 342, 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.131 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that in this case no injury was caused to any one.

¶19

4.Considering the above said aspect, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under

¶20

¶21

Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

sd/-

¶24

20/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶28

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGIRI POLICE STATION,

¶29

TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT,

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.6777

¶32

GNS

¶33

JAM/26/04/2018/ PN/GSR/ 2P-6C

¶34

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6464 of 2018 Date :20/04/2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajiv Gandhi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajiv Gandhi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Kumarasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Manimaran Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Divya Vs the Inspector of Police

T. Vijayakumar Vs the Inspector of Police