Allowed

G.Karthick v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6383/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail (CRL. OP. 6383/2018). The petitioner faced arrest for offences including public nuisance, assault, criminal intimidation, and cattle расист acting under the TNHW Act, following an appeal under SCFT Act section 32. Bail conditions imposed include appearance via bond, execution of sureties, and appearance at polling stat

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on conditions: appearance within 15 days, execution of Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, and appearance before police.

G.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶4

CRL OP(MD) No.6383 of 2018

¶5

G.KARTHICK REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER/NATURAL GUARDIAN GANESAN, MELACHETTI STREET, MANACHANALLUR, TRICHY DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER

¶6

¶7

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANACHANALLUR POLICE STATION TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT

¶8

CR.NO.50/2018 ... RESPONDENT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.G.VAIRAM SANTHOSH Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) I.P.C. and Section 4 of TNHW Act, in Crime No.50 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that no injury has been caused to the defacto complainant. There is no previous case registered against the petitioner.

¶16

4.Taking note of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further

¶17

condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶18

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶19

sd/-

¶20

19/04/2018

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, TRICHY

¶26

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANACHANALLUR POLICE STATION TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT

¶28

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

+1. CC to M/S.G.VAIRAM SANTHOSH Advocate SR.No.6615

¶30

MSA

¶31

GJMPN/RNB/24.4.18-2P-6C

¶32

ORDER IN

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.6383 of 2018

¶34

Date :19/04/2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Karthick v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Karthick v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Krishnaveni Vs G. Jeyaraman

V. Thinakaran, S/O.Vellaisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Keeripatti Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Kumarasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Veeramani Vs the Inspector of Police