Allowed

Manimaran Murugan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6449/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of theft. The court released them on bond with conditions to appear for interrogation and comply with Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with conditions to execute a bond sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, appear for interrogation, and apply before Magistrate within 15 days.

Manimaran Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.6449 of 2018

¶6

1 MANIMARAN MURUGAN 2 THAVABALAN

¶7

... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

¶8

STATE REP.BY ITS

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION (CRIME), MADURAI CITY. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioners: M/S.J.RAMAMOORTHY, Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 380 IPC in Crime No. Not Known of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

¶16

3.One Thangam had given this complaint, suspecting that the petitioners are involved in the theft of gold jewels. The occurrence is said to have taken place on 22.03.2018 and the complaint given by the de facto complainant only on 26.03.2018. Petitioners are workers engaged in collection of subscription.

¶17

4.Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The

¶18

petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶19

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.

¶24

DO THROUGH THE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶25

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION (CRIME), MADURAI CITY.

¶26

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

MS/RR/SAR.4/02.05.2018/2P.5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Manimaran Murugan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manimaran Murugan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Kumarasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajiv Gandhi Vs the Inspector of Police

Divya Vs the Inspector of Police

T. Vijayakumar Vs the Inspector of Police