Allowed

R.Kumarasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/3502/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a job racketing case. The court ordered a deposit of Rs. 1 lakh and release on personal bond with conditions to appear for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal undertaking and a deposit of Rs. 1,00,000/- with conditions on appearance for interrogation.

R.Kumarasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.3502 of 2018

¶6

R.KUMARASAMY, ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶7

¶8

1 THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶9

(CRIME NO.461 OF 2017) ..1ST RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

2 M.SUBRAMANIAN, ... 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM Advocate

¶12

For Respondents: MR.A.ROBINSON,

¶13

Government Advocate (Crl. Side) FOR R1

¶14

: MR.M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate FOR R2

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C., in Crime No.461 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

¶19

3.It is a case of job racketing. The defacto complainant is said to have given a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the petitioner.

¶20

4.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.461 of 2017 before the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor. The defacto complainant is entitled to withdraw the same.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned

¶22

Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶24

sd/19/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VALLIYOOR, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No. +1cc to MR.M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate in SR.No. 6576 MSA

¶28

GJM/PN/RNB/24.4.18-2P-7C

¶29

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3502 of 2018 Date :19/04/2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Kumarasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Kumarasamy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Krishnaveni Vs G. Jeyaraman

V. Thinakaran, S/O.Vellaisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Keeripatti Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

P.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Veeramani Vs the Inspector of Police