Allowed

Veeramani v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6363/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing arrest under state sections 147-148, 294(b), 324 and 307 IPC arising from a temple festival. Bail was conditional upon executing a bond, producing sureties, and appearing for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail upon executing a bond for Rs.10,000 each with sureties and appearing for interrogation.

Veeramani Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.6363 of 2018

¶6

1 VEERAMANI 2 KAMAL @ MAHADEVAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.3&4

¶7

THE STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. CR.NO.13/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioners : M/S.B.S.MELTIUE Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 307 I.P.C in Crime No.13 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶16

Taking note of the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the occurrence arose out of temple festival, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶17

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶18

sd/19/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶19

	Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
	Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
MSA TO
1	THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
	THIRUVAIYARU, THANJAVUR DISTRICT
2	THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM
3	THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
4	THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1.	CC to M/S.B.S.MELTIUE Advocate SR.No.6619
MSA
GJM	/PN/RNB/24.4.18-2P-6C

¶20

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6363 of 2018 Date :19/04/2018

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Veeramani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeramani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Krishnaveni Vs G. Jeyaraman

V. Thinakaran, S/O.Vellaisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Keeripatti Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Kumarasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police