The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to V. Thinakaran in a case involving offences under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) of IPC, returning sureties and waiving fresh surrender.
Anticipatory bail made absolute; no fresh surrender or sureties required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.2546 of 2018
V. THINAKARAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT . CR.NO.75 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : Mr.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
For Intervenor : M/S.K.MALATHI, Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 506(i) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.75 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2
interim bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court dated 22.02.2018 and that the petitioner already produced the sureties in the said interim bail and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.
anticipatory bail is made absolute. Hence, there is no need for the petitioner to surrender afresh or execute sureties afresh.
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
TO
SMA/PMI/GSR/24.04.2018:2P/7C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted absolutely to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) of IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V. THINAKARAN
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G.R. SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
