Allowed

S.Sivaramakrishnan v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5596/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 294(b), 341, and 506(ii) IPC. As no FIR was registered and the complainant was the wife of the first petitioner, the Court granted bail subject to executing a bond, appearing before the Judicial Magistrate within 15 days, and complying with police interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered released on bail subject to bond, sureties, appearance before Magistrate within 15 days, and police interrogation.

S.Sivaramakrishnan Vs Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Tenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.5596 of 2018

¶7

1 S.SIVARAMAKRISHNAN 2 V.SUBRAMANIAN 3 S.JEYALAKSHMI 4 S.SRIRAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs

¶8

STATE REP BY

¶9

INSPECTOR OF POLICE C3, SUTHAMALLY POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioners : M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 & 506(ii) IPC in Crime No. Not Known of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

¶16

3.The de facto complainant is the wife of the first petitioner. The first petitioner is also working in Cognizant at Chennai. Till date no FIR has been registered.

¶17

4.Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District and on their

¶18

¶19

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶21

sd/10/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶27

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶29

C3, SUTHAMALLY POLICE STATION,

¶30

TIRUNELVELI,

¶31

TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.5831

¶34

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5596 of 2018 Date :10/04/2018 SMA/KAK-PN/SAR-2/16.04.2018:2P/6C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sivaramakrishnan v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sivaramakrishnan v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirumurugan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Rathinakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Pitchammal Vs the Inspector of Police

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

Eerudi Kumarraja, Vs the Inspector of Police

Pavan Durai, Vs the Inspector of Police