Allowed

Pitchammal v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5496/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court considered a petition for anticipatory bail filed by a mother and her sons accused of abetment to suicide. Relying on their familial relationship with the deceased, the court granted bail with specific conditions including execution of a bond and appearance for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

petitioners ordered released on bail upon appearance before the Magistrate, execution of bond with two sureties, and compliance with summon conditions.

Pitchammal Vs the Inspector of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5496 of 2018

¶6

1 PITCHAMMAL

¶7

2 JOHN MAHESH GNANABALAN 3 JOHN RAMESH 4 JOHN SELVAKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4

¶8

¶9

STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶10

CRIME NO.135 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.S.CHANDRAN Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU,

¶13

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners/ accused Nos.1 to 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the the Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakuymari District for the offences punishable under Section 306 of IPC in Crime No.135 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶18

3.The deceased in this case is none other than the son of the first petitioner and the brother of the other petitioners. The defacto complainant is the wife of the deceased.

¶19

4.Considering the fact that the first petitioner is the own https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ mother and other petitioners are own blood brothers of the deceased, this court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners

¶20

with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Nagercoil and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶21

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶22

sd/-

¶23

09/04/2018

¶24

/ TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶26

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶27

Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II,NAGERCOIL.

¶30

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

¶31

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.S.CHANDRAN Advocate SR.No.5723

¶34

TSG

¶35

CSL/PN-KAK/VK/13.04.2018 :2P/6C

¶36

ORDER

¶37

¶38

CRL OP(MD) No.5496 of 2018

¶39

Date :09/04/2018

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pitchammal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pitchammal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Jesuraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

Haja Mohideen, Vs the Inspector of Police

Thirumurugan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Rathinakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajan Sethupathi Vs the Inspector of Police