Allowed

Thirumurugan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5061/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons facing charges of affray and extortion. The petitioners must execute a bond and appear before the concerned magistrate and police.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail in the event of arrest, conditioned upon executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and appearing before the magistrate and police as required.

Thirumurugan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5061 of 2018

¶6

1 THIRUMURUGAN 2 NAGARAJ, 3 AZHAGUMEENAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.3,4 & 5

¶7

Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R.S.MANGALAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. (CR.NO.29/2018). ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S.P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : M/S. A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioners/ accused Nos.3, 4 & 5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the the Sub Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 427, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.29 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl side) appearing for the respondent submitted that there is no previous case pending against any one of the petitioners and the injured person has also been discharged from the hospital.

¶15

4.Considering the allegations made against the petitioners , this court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai and on their

¶16

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶17

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶18

sd/09/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 DO THOUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R.S.MANGALAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate SR.No.5656.

¶19

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5061 of 2018 Date :09/04/2018 SDS/CM:VR/VK/12.04.2018/3P/6C

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thirumurugan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thirumurugan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Jesuraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

Haja Mohideen, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Rathinakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Pitchammal Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajan Sethupathi Vs the Inspector of Police