Allowed

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5386/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Cr. O.P. No. 5386 of 2018, who faced charges under Sections 324 and 506(ii) IPC. The court imposed conditions regarding a surety bond and appearance before the police.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail if arrested, to execute a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, and to appear before the police and the Magistrate within specified conditions and timelines.

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.5386 of 2018

¶7

C.GOVINDHA MANIMUTHU @ GOVINDHA MANIKANDAN

¶8

... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1

¶9

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.71 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU

¶12

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.71 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner assaulted the de-facto complainant and made criminal intimidation against him. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners.

¶17

3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶18

4.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) that the injured is still in the Hospital.

¶19

5.Even though the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ submitted that the injured is still in hospital, it appears that the nature of injury is not serious, which would not result in

¶20

¶21

alteration of the FIR.

¶22

6.Taking note of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶24

sd/-

¶25

06/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶29

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶30

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION,

¶31

RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate SR.No.5620

¶34

SMN2

¶35

JAM/11/04/2018/ PN-KAK / GSR/ 2P-6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Govindha Manimuthu @ v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Koothaperumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Eswaramoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Praveen Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Jesuraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

Haja Mohideen, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathiyaseelan Vs the Inspector of Police