Allowed

K.Praveen Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC5 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5180/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges including public nuisance, assault, criminal intimidation, and violation of the TN Prohibition on Premises of Private Dwellings Act arising from a quarrel during a funeral. The court imposed conditions requiring a bond, appearance before the police, and compliance with statutory mandates.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail against anticipatory arrest upon execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and strict compliance with listed conditions including police appearance and Magistra

K.Praveen Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.5180 of 2018

¶7

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 49 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioners : M/S.M.PREETHI Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU

¶10

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii), IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act and Under Section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No. 49 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

¶15

3.During the funeral function, quarrel arose between the de facto complainant and the petitioners herein.

¶16

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case registered against the petitioners herein.

¶17

5.Considering the allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance

¶18

¶19

before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Keeranur and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶21

sd/05/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KEERANUR, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT

¶27

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION,

¶29

PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT,

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.M.PREETHI Advocate SR.No.59868

¶32

GNS

¶33

JAM/13/04/2018/ CM-VR /GSR/ 2P-6C

¶34

ORDER

¶35

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.5180 of 2018

¶37

Date :05/04/2018

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Praveen Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Praveen Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Suresh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan Vs the Inspector of Police

Panchavarnam Vs the Inspector of Police

Manimaran, Vs the Inspector of Police

Koothaperumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Eswaramoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police