Disposed

Senthamarai Kannan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/2171/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition, the petitioners sought directions to expedite the trial of a pending case to facilitate the second petitioner's passport application. The court directed the Judicial Magistrate to dispose of the trial within six months and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil to dispose of C.C.No.2 of 2017 within six months.

Senthamarai Kannan, Vs the Inspector of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.02.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2018

¶7

1.Senthamarai Kannan

¶8

2.Kirubakaran

¶9

... Petitioners/A1 and A2

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, to expedite the trial pending in C.C.No.2 of 2017, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Senthil For Respondent : Mr.Prabu Ramachandran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, to dispose of the Case in C.C.No.2 of 2017, at early.

¶16

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the second petitioner is a college student, who is studying III year B.E., in SMS College of Technology at Coimbatore. The aforesaid case is pending against him, hence, he is not able to get Passport, hence, he requests this Court to give a direction to the concerned Judicial Magistrate to dispose of the case, at early.

¶17

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has submitted that now the case is pending for examinations of the witnesses on the prosecution side. He further submitted that totally seven witnesses on the side of the prosecution. He requests some https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ reasonable time may by fixed for disposing of the aforesaid case.

¶18

¶19

4.Considering the aforesaid submissions, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil is directed to expedite the trail and dispose of the case in C.C.No.2 of 2017, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶20

5.With the aforesaid submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. + 1 CC TO Mr.D.SENTHIL, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 49455 IA TE/SKN-RSK/SAR-4 : 19/03/2018 : 2P/5C CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2018 16.02.2018

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Senthamarai Kannan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthamarai Kannan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.M.Duraisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.a.Raju Vs the Superintendent of Police

A.Anwar Basha, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Pandiyaraja Ammal Vs M.Uma Maheswari

V. Pandiarajan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

S.Karunanithi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police