Disposed

A.Anwar Basha, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC15 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/2089/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed to direct the police to register a case regarding a civil dispute over partnership and money. The court noted the complaint was forwarded to police and subsequently closed with a direction to approach the Civil Court, without expressly ruling on the petitioner's specific prayer. It was left open for the petitioner to avail

What the court decided

AI extract

A.Anwar Basha, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 15.02.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2089 of 2018

A.Anwar Basha

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2^nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.05.2017 and take necessary action against the proposed accused within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondents : Mr.Prabu Ramachandran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 12.05.2017.

¶16

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner and the proposed accused were partners and they were doing Mango business, during the said business, the proposed accused has received a sum of Rs.18,00,500/- and also he has obtained signatures in the blank papers, and the said person has not returned the said amount and also criminally intimidated him and hence, the petitioner has lodged on 12.05.2017, but so far, no action has been taken.

¶17

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has submitted that after receipt of the complaint, enquiry has been conducted https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and the same has been closed on 21.01.2018, directing the parties to approach the Civil Court.

¶18

¶19

4.Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. It is open to the petitioner to avail any other remedy, which is available under the law.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

¶27

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

- 1 cc TO Mr.B.Jameel Arasu , Advocate in SR No. 49120

¶29

¶30

AE/CVC/SAR4/09.03.2018/2P/5C

¶31

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2089 of 2018

¶32

15.02.2018

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Anwar Basha, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A.Anwar Basha, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakthikani @ Sathiya Vs the Inspector of Police

Malathi Vs K.M. Parvathi

Anto Jegan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.M.Duraisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.a.Raju Vs the Superintendent of Police

Saraswathi Vs the Superintendent of Police